Correction and Retraction

Al-Ibrah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keilmuan Islam is committed to maintaining the accuracy, transparency, and integrity of the scholarly record. The journal recognizes its responsibility to correct errors, address concerns regarding published articles, and retract publications when necessary. All corrections and retractions are handled fairly, transparently, and in accordance with publication ethics principles.

1. Corrections

A correction may be issued when an error is identified in a published article and the error affects the accuracy, clarity, or interpretation of the content but does not invalidate the overall findings or conclusions.

Corrections may address, but are not limited to, errors in author names or affiliations, typographical errors that affect meaning, inaccurate information, errors in tables or figures, and other factual inaccuracies.

Authors who identify an error in their published article should promptly notify the editorial office and provide a clear explanation of the error and the proposed correction. Readers and other parties may also report suspected errors to the journal.

The editor will assess the nature and significance of the error and determine whether a formal correction is necessary. When approved, the correction will be published as a separate notice linked to the original article. The original article will remain accessible, and the correction notice will clearly identify the changes made.

2. Expressions of Concern

An expression of concern may be issued when credible questions arise regarding the reliability, integrity, or ethical acceptability of a published article, but the available evidence is insufficient to reach a final decision.

An expression of concern may also be considered when an investigation is ongoing and its outcome is likely to affect the reliability of the publication. The notice will explain the nature of the concern to the extent possible without compromising a fair investigation.

The journal may update or remove the expression of concern when the matter has been resolved, depending on the outcome and the editorial decision.

3. Retractions

A retraction may be issued when the reliability of a published article is seriously compromised or when publication ethics have been substantially violated. Grounds for retraction may include, but are not limited to:

  1. Confirmed data fabrication or falsification.

  2. Plagiarism or substantial unattributed appropriation of another person's work.

  3. Serious errors that invalidate the principal findings or conclusions.

  4. Unethical research practices that materially undermine the validity or ethical acceptability of the work.

  5. Redundant or duplicate publication that significantly compromises the integrity of the scholarly record.

  6. Other substantiated forms of research or publication misconduct that justify retraction.

Retraction decisions will be based on an assessment of the available evidence and the seriousness of the issue. A retraction is intended to correct the scholarly record, not to punish authors.

4. Retraction Procedure

When a potential ground for retraction is identified, the editor will assess the available evidence and may request an explanation or supporting documentation from the authors. The authors will be given a reasonable opportunity to respond.

Where appropriate, the journal may consult the authors' affiliated institution, research funder, or other relevant authority. The journal will evaluate the information impartially and document the basis for its decision.

If retraction is warranted, the journal will publish a retraction notice that:

  • Clearly identifies the retracted article and provides its bibliographic information and DOI, where available.

  • States that the article has been retracted.

  • Explains the reason for retraction to the extent possible and appropriate.

  • Identifies the party initiating the retraction, where appropriate.

  • Is linked to the original article to ensure that readers are aware of the retraction.

The original article will normally remain accessible with a clear retraction notice or watermark, preserving the publication history and maintaining transparency in the scholarly record. Any changes to the article's online record will be made in accordance with applicable legal and ethical requirements.

5. Responsibilities of Authors and Editors

Authors are responsible for notifying the journal promptly when they discover significant errors in their published work and for cooperating with the editorial process.

The editor is responsible for assessing reported concerns, determining appropriate editorial action, documenting decisions, and ensuring that corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions are communicated clearly.

Editorial decisions will be made independently and impartially, based on the available evidence and the journal's publication ethics policies.

6. Reporting Errors and Concerns

Readers, authors, reviewers, and other interested parties may report suspected errors or concerns about a published article by contacting the editorial office through the journal's official contact details.

Reports should identify the article concerned and provide a clear description of the issue, together with supporting evidence where available. The journal will review reports in good faith and handle them confidentially to the extent reasonably possible.

7. Transparency and Publication Ethics

The journal aims to ensure that all corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions are handled transparently and consistently. These actions are intended to protect readers, preserve trust in scholarly communication, and maintain the accuracy and integrity of the academic record.

All decisions will be guided by the journal's publication ethics policies and relevant scholarly publishing standards.